Days from US

主にニュースはNPRをソースに日々翻訳していきます。英語学習に関する自分の体験もここにシェアをしていきます。

Political Belief of Pro-Life or Pro-Choice

Introduction

Historical moment came up in this January. In Anti-abortion rally, Donald Trump is the first president to address in person on this event. I personally looked at this news as issue out of political negotiation because of Donald Trump whom we have recognized as one of eminent entertainers in the United States, and anti-abortion rally looked like the minor issue rather than other diplomatic and national security issues. The U.S. political landscape unfortunately has been filled by anti-social issues like a conspiracy theory or bribery involving other countries. But anti-abortion is a topic relating women’s right. I did not think this news as simple political context of view.

In searching his belief for abortion, there are several things not consistent as concrete one of Trump policies. In 1999, “I am very Pro-Choice” (2015), that obviously indicate his origin had been opposed to current status. “In mid-February 2011, with Trump again fueling speculation that he would run for president, he spoke at the annual meeting of the Conservative Political Action Committee. In his 14-minute speech, he made this simple declaration: "I am pro-life.".” (Greenberg, 2015). The reason Trump had changed his point of view about abortion should be the story his great friend sharing with Donald Trump. That was a time he would be asking the timing to run the presidential race as a republican. Four years later, his announcement of presidential candidacy was June 15, 2015, and he swore as Pro-Life nine month later of address to run the presidential race. And we have been already familiar with this historical moment in January 2020, address in March of Life rally.

Just once a while Trump had changed his policy from Pro-Choice to Pro-Life. Obviously, he looks consistent to be “Pro-Life” during Republican. Also, 1999 is very obscure how his political stance was. Presidential campaign in 2000 is the one of occasion for Trump to run the race. Why didn’t he say “I’m Pro-Life” in 1999? However, Trump mentioned “I hate the concept of abortion but,” (2015). We actually can observe it seems consistent Trump hates the concept of abortion at least, and address of 2020 is one of the reflections of his political belief since 2011.

Methodology

CNN, FOX, and CNBC are all that this paper refers. Those of whom released articles of the event “March of Life” at twenty fourth, January 2020. This paper is going to compare among three web news of them and analyze how they observe this event. As this paper told in last chapter, there are no exact evidence that Trump has Pro-Life belief as political purpose. Thus, those three papers will be simply compared those content during the research as following.

  • What is the major subject in this web news?
  • How do three media conclude why Trump engaged this topic?
  • What are other aspects each one of them exclusively have?

Political perspectives of these networks should be explained as following, CNN should be anti-Trump and FOX must be supportive. CNBC is observed as Left-Centered that means in center more than others. (2020). Conclusion will have been the byproduct of political stances on referred networks such as CNN criticize Trump address in the rally, FOX is supposed to describe a political context that is one of advantages for Trump, and CNBC might go moderate. And, explaining of the limitation and prospects which are for better future is the last part of this research.

Summary

Here is the summary to get the conclusion concisely to distinguish one another. The major subjects and how Trump described in those contexts in going to be explained.

Qestion1: What is the major subject in this web news?

  • CNBC: Rally and Trump
  • FOX: Democrats and Pro-Life supporters
  • CNN: Trump

Here are adding notes for detail of all. CNBC gave short message that looks like focusing on deliver what occurred in this event. On contrary, FOX focused on telling the story of Democrats supporters and Pro-Life supporters instead of describing Trump. A sense of how CNN aired is that majority of topic sentences of first paragraph are President Trump. There have been already differences.

Question2: How do three media conclude why Trump engaged this topic?

  • CNBC: The first sitting president to attend the Washington protest against the landmark Roe vs. (Dzhanova, 2020)
  • FOX: No comments by FOX but Pro-Life supporters.
  • CNN: Trump, making history as the first President to attend the event since it began nearly a half-century ago, looked to strengthen his ties to a key coalition of his political base, which he'll need as he seeks reelection this year. (Kelly, 2020)

There are also additional details for second question to make it rather clear. CNBC launched this news with historical fact that Trump is the first President of United States to address in person. FOX looks numerous unique which they shared the comments from Pro-Life supporters. CNN has been already included anti-Trump expression for describing what kind of impact Trump gave through the rally by connecting with political context. CNBC and CNN have characterized Trump in early part of both articles. However, CNN put historical fact and political content each other.

Question3: What are other aspects each one of them exclusively have?

 CNBC released shorter article rather than others, also is only news being added impeachment trial schedule. Just observation might be that this article to imply that Trump address in person in order to blur negative impact of this trial. When it comes the President of United States, Twitter is the great channel to know what is going on. However, CNBC is the only one media to share the twitter of Trump. And address of Trump is uploaded on the web news pages with no editing. CNBC looks aiming to deliver the fact, even which are going to be small amount of news.

FOX is stating a lot of comments from Democrats struggling of this address and Pro-Life supporters and focusing on qualitative approach to make sure the story of what FOX try to deliver to the readers. A context in this article is that this address should be done by Democrats because of the right of unborn child. Even democrats responded to refute Trump in this article, a lot of Pro-Life supporters are sharing their story to support how precious thing Trump did in this event. Democrats are struggling and some of the most democratic persons are going to be close to Trump. This is how FOX made the context through this article.

CNN pointed a part of speech is what Trump is faking. Also, CNN clarified this fake is to criticize Democratic gov. There would be a prospect that two cases of Supreme Court will conclude the abortion as legal act. Even this is small thing, CNN is only one news there is not video link to watch the address of Trump. In following paragraph, CNN looks to share the historical context and background of this event consistently.

 

Conclusion

Through this research, this paper can conclude that this topic could be shared with each of political stances such as CNBC is moderate, FOX from right wing, and CNN as liberal group’s point of view. However, we need how Trump is thinking about abortion in his real heart. Even this part was touched in introduction part of this paper, here is only things that Trump changed his mind in 2011. If the researchers can make it and he truly hate an abortion, CNBC and FOX will be better media than CNN. But in opposite case, CNN is only one news getting a point. Here is the limitation the folks has no way what the true hearts are for the politicians. While they are acting to get voters in their state, every kind of actions look like a game to win the election. I personally do not think this is the smart democracy.

The thing those three media explain each of different perspectives is the great environment to observe politics. This research did to align three aspect on one event. Sometimes people need to take a look how other media treat this event. And, their will to be close into the only one fact is great way to gain the quality of voting behavior. However, worst case in this context is that the situation like Trump supporters only watch the FOX news and Biden supporters just believe the CNN instead of desiring for how other news are treating both side of political belief.